Mar 31, 2020

Batch of 2020

SIMRAN RAWAT



I wasn’t entirely sure how to start off this piece but I’m going to go ahead and do it anyhow because it’s a very apt metaphor for the entire college experience. There have been several times that LSR has seemed intense and intimidating, yet here I am at the end of 3 years, much better off for having gone through the gauntlet. My name is Simran Rawat and I’m a final year student of the Journalism Department at LSR.

Mar 30, 2020

C3 Reporting and Editing for Print: Journalism


UNIT 2 Interviewing/Types of news leads

Interviewing: doing the research, setting up the interview, conducting the interview


News Leads/intros, Structure of the News Story–Inverted Pyramid style; Lead: importance, types of lead; body of the story; attribution, verification


Types of Leads:


Difference between articles and features:


Human Interest Stories


Articles, features, types of features and human interest stories , leads for features, difference between articles and features

Disclaimer: Links have been added from various sources to help students study during Covid-19 crisis. This is in public service)

Mar 29, 2020

In a lockdown, the fate of prisoners

In a lockdown, the fate of prisoners 

While placing restrictions on jail visits is understandable, an alternative and uniformed channel for communication must be created for inmates to reduce their anxiety

ANALYSIS Updated: Mar 28, 2020 18:39 IST
Vartika Nanda
Vartika Nanda





There are 1,339 prisons in the country which house 466,084 inmates; the actual capacity is 396,223. In the wake of the coronavirus outbreak, many jails have imposed restrictions on the visits of outsiders.
There are 1,339 prisons in the country which house 466,084 inmates; the actual capacity is 396,223. In the wake of the coronavirus outbreak, many jails have imposed restrictions on the visits of outsiders. (HTPHOTO/REPRESENTATION PURPOSES ONLY)

Amid the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19), two major stories have gone unnoticed. The first is that of the Iranian government temporarily releasing 85,000 prisoners in the wake of several virus-related deaths. The second is from India. A two-judge bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde and LN Rao issued a notice to the director-general, Prison, and chief secretaries of all states and Union territories on March 16, asking them about the precautionary measures taken to prevent the spread of the virus in the jails. Indian jails are now setting up isolation wards for those with Covid-19 symptoms. All the 17,500 inmates in Tihar, Delhi, have been checked for symptoms, and new inmates are being screened. Lists are being finalised to release selected inmates on parole or on interim bail. Tihar has prepared a list of 3,000 inmates while Uttar Pradesh has 10,000 and Maharashtra has 11,000 inmates on their lists. This process is likely to start today.
There are 1,339 prisons in the country which house 466,084 inmates; the actual capacity is 396,223. In the wake of the coronavirus outbreak, many jails have imposed restrictions on the visits of outsiders. 
Visitations in prisons are of three types. The first is the one-to-one physical meeting in which an inmate is allowed to meet their visitor in an open room or lawn. They get the freedom to physically touch each other and talk. For the inmate and the visitor, this is the most satisfying form of meeting. The second is the meeting across a meshed window, which occurs in a large number of prisons. A large number of inmates in one room, talking to visitors in another room, leaves no space for privacy. The third is with toughened glass that works as a barrier between the inmate and the visitor, with an intercom on both sides. Since prison is a state subject, all states are taking their own decision, but most of the jails have closed all the three visitations. They are now restricting inmates to phone calls. 
The ministry of home affairs prepared the Model Prison Manual, 2016, after building a national consensus on issues of prison reforms and highlighted the need for proper visitations. But visitations are still considered a privilege and not a right and can be reduced or completely cut if the inmate does not “behave well”.
The other issue is related to the telephone system in prisons. Even now, only a few states permit women inmates to make use of the telephone in prisons, which are available to male inmates. Prison administrators say this is because the public call office is placed in the male unit and this restricts the entry of women. Women inmates already receive fewer visitations as compared to men, due to alienation by their families.
So, when any such facility is removed from inmates’ daily routine, it comes as a shock to them. Those who have interacted with inmates will testify that inmates eagerly wait for their visitations. While placing restrictions on visits is understandable, an alternative and uniformed channel for communication must be created for them to reduce anxiety. Also, inmates are helping the nation by making masks. But this too has gone unnoticed. While taking away the concession of visits for some time, the system must also remember the contribution of inmates and the jail staff in this time of crisis.
Vartika Nanda is a prison reformer
The views expressed are personal

IS THE INDIAN MEDIA JUST ABOUT SENSATIONALISM?

By Shehjar Bhat

Dave Brat once said, “The media does play a vital role in our democracy and if we cannot depend on journalistic ethics, the nation is in trouble.” 
The media, considered as the “Fourth Pillar” in a secular and democratic framework, has been instrumental in reaching and equipping masses with the needed knowledge ever since its advent. It plays an important role in shaping not just perceptions, but also the national agenda. 
Besides several ethics and principles, a Journalist must refrain from getting their prejudices and biases into forefront or in their coverage while reporting. The Indian Media has been a constant source of information for citizens’ since the colonial period and still is one of the most dependable sources. From the old age days of Newspaper, Television and Radio-to- the present era age of Mobile phones, IPads and SNS— it has undergone a lot of changes. 
The Indian media industry has grown tremendously in the past few years, but the corporate and political influence on journalists has also increased manifolds. Journalism in India is facing a serious crisis and the industry is in an upheaval.
Indian Media has been in everyone’s eyes and diaries for all the wrong reasons and is often accused of being involved in corrupt practices and in favor of certain publishers, political parties, business houses and religious institutions. The media is believed to be engaged in yellow journalism or dramatization of events and news rather than reflecting the informative part. There are numerous instances that are symbolic of its bend towards sensational, political, catchy and made up content that does nothing, but just shoots up the TRP and profits for that organization or media house. Not only distorted or falsified content, media has often used and targeted religious groups to make appeals, arouse emotions and spread hatred amongst the society. 
From Rohit Vemula’s over-sensationalized and poorly covered suicide case-to-the 2016 viral videos of JNU wherein news anchors engaged in character assassination of three students; media’s coverage and reporting style has ended up creating a rift across nation and groups.
The Indian media mostly lives under the influence of those in power and who have the ability of controlling all the processes—from what gets reported, who gets presented positively to who gets flaked. The overpowering sway of the moneyed on editorial policies;  media house’s commercial orientation; and Government’s control over resources such as newsprint, communications and advertisements are some of the few examples of how media’s true power and strength are often hampered and this results in the production of skewed reporting. 
So how can media live up to its functions of maintaining checks and balances and acting as a watchdog of the democracy when it itself is producing favored, buyable and sellable content?
If there’s any time to conduct a reality check and ask whether all is well with the profession of journalism and media, it is not tomorrow or later but Now. 
Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are personal and those of the author. 

Bravery & Responsibility: A Journalistic Reality or a Mere Illusion?

By Anushree Mukherjee

Courage has popularised itself as the antidote of mundane news in the modern journalistic sphere. Our society has tilted its attentive bias to measure the risk value of a story way before it even considers the other values it inhabits.  
Lance Morrow accurately noted-“Seventy-three journalists have died covering the war in Iraq; elsewhere 171 journalists have died doing their work in the past six years.”
The ‘sensationalistic’ tendency of news cycles in the 21st century has normalised reporting that takes place in dangerous and life-threatening physical, political and corporate arenas. The life of a reporter is inevitably linked with severe risks such as psychological trauma, the lack of guarantee to safety or protection, and the fears of ostracization sanctioned by the powerful executives at work. 
One would argue that essence of journalism has always been in uncovering the truth and digging the concealed layers and presenting the reality. However, the virtue of truth has somewhere gone out of focus in this quest of journalistic gallantry. A reporter needs to be characterised by his devotion to the ethical obligations of fact-checking, accountability, objectivity and integrity and must stay true to his virtues. 
The test of fearless reporting lies equally in questioning the status quo, amplifying the public interest and verifying prejudices that encourage day-to-day discrimination, as it does in sting operations and war coverage. A brave journalist may flaunt the medallions of self-interest, but a responsible journalism always goes beyond the one-dimensional newsroom process. Unless this aspiration is embodied in the new-age reporting sphere, journalism will lose its relevance as the fourth estate and thereafter, the estate will lose its most valued democratic agency. 

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE INDIAN DYNAMIC

By: Samridhi Chug

I opened my mouth, but the law sealed my lips.
Since time unbeknownst, man has attempted to use his voice to speak his mind, his hands to jot his philosophy, tiny gestures that morphed his mental aerobics to tangible manifestations. The political state was well aware that “a pen is mightier than the sword,” but still actively sought to drain the common man's ink and grip his tongue with their unruly and unbalanced ways. The contemporary Indian imagination rests well on this predicament.

While the Constitution of India in Article 19(1)(a) guaranteed every Indian citizen “the right to freedom of thought, speech and expression,” it was furtive in veneering it with the disclaimer of “reasonable restrictions” under the same Article. It cited a nation's sovereignty and integrity, public order, security, and morality as some of the very ambiguous grounds that could put your liberty on hold. And why not, after all, the bottom-line of our fundamental rights does swear by Holmes' Adage-“Your freedom ends where my nose begins.” And so it was clear that the Right to Freedom of Speech, just like any other right was never meant to be absolute, in principle, or in practice.

Legally speaking, the Indian Penal Code, 1860, criminalises ‘Obscenity’ under Section 292, while Section 298 bars individuals from “uttering any word or making any sound with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of another person.” Section 124A of the IPC, a colonial remnant that defines Sedition, still remains a concrete bone of contention among the members of the civil society and the political state.

The post 1990s era has recorded the murder of at least 48 journalists, with only one case in the purview of prosecution which is a reflection of the grim media scenario in the country. According to the 2019 estimates of Reporters without Borders, India ranked 140th worldwide in Press Freedom Index. Censorship on press and other forms of mediated expression remains a reality well-lived through the 70+ years of the country's independence.

Voltaire famously said, “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to death your right to speak.” As contemporary India turns septuagenarian, youthful and defiant, but still maturing in its tryst with destiny, it is time that the citizens are given free wings, a tongue without restraint, and a space that allows dialectical exchange of ideas. Only when the freedom to be free and independent will be given can the nation step towards pinnacle.

Surge, evolution, liberty!

Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are personal and those of the author.

ARE THE JOURNALISTS IN DANGER? 

By: Palomi Gupta

Lord Macaulay once said, “Media is the forth pillar of democracy.”
But is this statement true and applicable in the current scenario?
The mission of journalists is to seek the truth and help people understand the world. The quest of informing people comes in many forms. From investigations on sexual abuse that sparked the ‘#MeToo movement’–to- a fact-based reporting on how technology is reshaping every facet of modern life or a consequential and hard-hitting commentary on the political landscape of the country; the field of journalism is continuously evolving.  
But at a moment when surging nationalism is leading people to recede inward, one of the most consequential jobs of our journalists is to shine a light outward. 

Journalists, serving at the frontline of the Right to Freedom of Expression and access to information, must be able to carry out their work without trepidation of reprisal or dismay. 
Over the last few years, however, things have dramatically transmuted. Around the globe, a relentless campaign is targeting journalists because of the fundamental role they play in ascertaining a free and apprised society.
The first ever assassination of an Indian journalist—Bakshi Singh Tirath, which occurred on the dreadful 27thFebruary, 1992 was no less than a nightmare to all and what followed after that is nothing, but more bloodsheds and killings.
To stop journalists from exposing uncomfortable truths and holding power to account, a growing number of regimes have engaged in overt and truculent efforts to discredit their work and daunt them into silence.
In India, 18 journalists were murdered between 2008 to 2018. One of the victims of such cold-blooded murders was journalist Gauri Lankesh, who was shot near her Bangalore residence on September 5, 2017. Her assailants haven't been identified yet. Another journalist Shujaat Bukhari, was shot and killed on June 14, along with two police officers assigned to him for protection, for his reporting on the situation in Kashmir.
These ruthless murders are symptomatic of a more immensely colossal quandary of silencing journalists. Both journalists and journalism are made to suffer. Truth be told, till date there is no countrywide legislation to forefend journalists, though Maharashtra in 2017, became the first ever state to have passed the journalists’ protection law in the country. 
All in all, the space for journalistic freedom seems to be shrinking with each passing day. It's a country bereft of laws to protect the fourth pillar of our democracy. It is pertinent that media must be made secure, independent, and fearless for the protection of not just our greater societal ethos, but to safeguard our democracy, our nation and the people who best define the nation itself.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are personal and those of the author.

ROLE OF MEDIA IN CHANGING THE SOCIETY

By Harshita Solanki
“WHOEVER CONTROLS THE MEDIA, CONTROLS THE MIND”- Jim Morrison
Media today is everywhere and has become an inseparable part of our lifestyle and routine. It also plays a dominant role in the learning process and has the potential to shape personalities, change the way we perceive & understand the world, and also helps us form our opinions. Media is the eyes and ears of the people and it surrounds us from all sides and spheres. We may not be able to travel the whole universe but media shows us what it’s like to be everywhere virtually. 
Media is the supper a society cannot live without. It is the media which allows people to think and expand their horizons and thinking patterns about the happenings and burning issues. Media is the sword and arm of Democracy and is expected to be unbiased and transparent. It is responsible for bringing out and uncovering the truth boldly and fearlessly because the readers, viewers, listeners and citizens have the right to be informed in the best possible and correct way. It should not only make the society aware of their democratic rights, but also enable them to exercise the rights they are bestowed with. It plays a dual role as the watchdog of the democracy that protects public interest against malpractices, and as a facilitator of information and public awareness.
With the mainstream media constantly bombarding the society with pro-government issues, media users now yearn for a different point of view and as a result are shifting towards alternative and more diverse sources of media.
Media at times has ignored stories of importance. It has ignored stories that ought to be heard, seen and attended to. It has often shown us just a part and not the whole picture or the reality. Media needs to cover everyone and everything. It needs to fairly cover all that happens in order to sustain its viewers. 
Media needs to objectively cover everything that happens in order to sustain itself.

Editing: Sanjana Chawla
Disclaimer: Views expressed in the article are personal and those of the author.

Mar 25, 2020


वो 21 दिन: कोरोना, जिंदगी और कुछ प्रार्थनाएं

Vartika nandaडॉ. वर्तिका नंदा Updated Wed, 25 Mar 2020 04:36 PM IST


कोरोना वायरस ने जो किया है, वह दुनिया में किसी ने कभी सोचा तक न था।
सन्नाटा। सब कुछ रुका हुआ। सड़कों पर गाड़ियां नहीं, आसमान पर जहाज नहीं। पास से गुजरते लोग नहीं। एक घर है। उसमें जो हैं, बस, फिलहाल वही संसार है। बाहर जा नहीं सकते। बाहर से अंदर कुछ ला नहीं सकते। 21 दिन का समय। तब तक समय ठहरा रहेगा।  कोरोना वायरस ने जो किया है, वह दुनिया में किसी ने कभी सोचा तक न था। अपनी और समाज की सलामती चाहने वालों को अब 21 दिन इस यज्ञ का हिस्स बनना है।

पंजाब का समय याद आ गया। आंतकवाद के दिनों में कर्फ्यू का लगना जिदंगी का हिस्सा बन गया था। सड़कें वीरान हो जातीं और घरों में डर पसरा रहता। मीडिया के नाम पर उन दिनों महज दूरदर्शन था जो शाम सात बजे पंजाबी में और रात 9 बजे राष्ट्रीय समाचार देता। खबरें छन कर आतीं। जितनी आतीं, उतने में संतोष किया जाता, यह जानकर भी कि स्थितियां बहुत अच्छी नहीं हैं।

कोरोना ने उस कर्फ्यू की भयावहता को जिंदा कर दिया है। लेकिन कोरोना एक दूसरी तरह की भयावहता है। एकदम अविस्मरणीय। अविश्वसनीय। पिछले कई दिनों से कोरोना को लेकर अखबारें और मीडिया सना है। दुनिया में पहला ऐसा मौका है जब दुनिया के कई बड़े देश एकसाथ थम गए हैं।
कोराना आया है तो जाएगा भी। लेकिन यह कोरोना सिर्फ एक वायरस नहीं है। यह चेतावनी है। यह स्मरण है। पहले प्रदूषण और फिर अब इस खतरनाक तरीके से कोरोना के भय के बीच प्रकृति ने बहुत कुछ जतलाने की कोशिश की है। तिनके की तरह। कोरोना का वायरस दिखता नहीं। वह रहता है। कहीं हवा में, कहीं स्पर्श में। यह जतलाते हुए कि जो नहीं दिखता, उसकी भी एक ताकत होती है। कई बार दिखने वाले से कहीं ज्यादा।  अब तक तो रुतबे वाले तकनीक को शहंशाह समझते रहे। जमीन और आसमान उन दुखों के साक्षी बनते रहे। सच की चाबी कहीं और थी। तलाश कहीं और हुई। झूठ और प्रचार की इतनी गठरियां भरीं कि अंतरिक्ष भी सहम गया।

कोरोना के आते ही सोशल मीडिया में कोरोना को लेकर पोस्ट्स का बहाव आ गया। प्रकृति के संदेश को बहुत से लोगों ने अब तक समझा ही नहीं है। प्रकृति शायद कम कहने, कम दिखने, जरूरतों सीमित करने, यात्राएं सीमित करने और भीड़ का हिस्सा बन प्रचार और आर्थिक भूख से खुद को रोकने की बात कह रही है। यह 21 दिन देश के लिए भारी हैं। यह संकट का समय है, मजाक का नहीं। ऐसे मजाक का तो कतई नहीं जिसमें समय काटने के लिए लोग अंताक्षरी खेलने का दावा करने लगें। घर के कई हिस्सों में बरसों से जाले थे। यह जाले ख्वाहिशों और बेइंतहा खरीदे सामानों के भी हैं। यह जाले घर के कालीन के नीचे रख दिए गए उन मसलों पर भी लग गए थे जिन पर बात करने का समय नहीं था। ऐसे 21 दिन पहले कभी नहीं आए। संकट ने इन 21 दिनों को उस इम्तहान के तौर पर दिया है जिसके नंबर हमें खुद देने हैं।

किसी दूसरे के हिस्से के सुखों को बटोर कर रखने वाले कई बार यह जान नहीं पाते कि कायनात में कई आहें भी होती हैं जो अपने तरीके से लौटती हैं। क्यों न इन 21 दिनों में अब तक की जिंदगी का लेखा-जोखा ले लिया जाए। अब समय खुद से मिलने का है। समय के पास आहों का वजन है। वजन कैसे पिघले। इसलिए आइए पहले भूल-चूक के बहीखाते को ठीक कर दिया जाए और फिर आसमान की तरफ कुछ प्रार्थनाएं उछाल दी जाएं।

(डॉ. वर्तिका नन्दा देश की स्थापित जेल सुधारक हैं। तिनका तिनका देश की जेल के लिए उनकी एक मुहिम है। देश की जेलों की अमानवीय परिस्थितियों को लेकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सुनवाई का हिस्सा भी बन चुकी हैं। )
#Corona #TinkaTinka #VartikaNanda

Courtesy: https://www.amarujala.com/columns/blog/coronavirus-21-days-lockdown-in-india-and-society?pageId=1  

Advertisement and Women

WOMEN: REPRESENTATIONS IN ADVERTISING

Published on September 15, 2003.

Although women are depicted in various roles and statuses in advertising—ranging from homemaker to business executive and from sex object to superwoman—it is only since the mid-20th century that women have been shown in roles other than purchaser of domestic products.
While some observers may be impatient with the traditional images of women used by major packaged-goods marketers, those depictions reflect meticulously calibrated research designed to detect the subtlest element of potential offense in the target group.

This market research-based advertising may not always show trend-setting women the images they want to see, but market research seldom leads advertisers far astray. In short, the roles of wife and mother continue to be performed by large numbers of women whom advertisers seek to address.

Targeting women: Early days

One of the most enduring female characters in advertising is Aunt Jemima, a trademark that had its beginnings in 1889. Invited to breakfast with millions of families all over the world for more than a century, Aunt Jemima eventually became an icon. By the end of the 20th century, she had undergone several face-lifts to reflect the evolving African-American consumer market.
While some products are named to entice women to buy them, none has enjoyed the success of Gold Medal flour and its Betty Crocker trade character. As a result of a successful promotional campaign for a pincushion in the 1920s, Washburn Crosby Co., the marketer of Gold Medal flour and forerunner of General Mills, found itself besieged with requests for the premium, along with more than 30,000 letters asking questions about baking.
Sam Gale, head of the company's ad department, decided that a single fictional spokeswoman should sign the response letters and decided on the name Betty Crocker. Blanche Ingersoll, a Washburn Crosby employee, became the voice of Betty Crocker on the radio in 1924. Since that time there have been at least eight different images of Betty Crocker. The most recent, introduced in 1996, was a multicultural composite of the features of 75 women of varying ethnicities.

Depression and war: Changing roles

The Great Depression and World War II left indelible marks on American society, and Rosie the Riveter and other ad icons of the time left their marks on advertising. Through the 1930s, ad copy continued to portray women primarily as homemakers or objects of sexual desire. In 1931, a magazine ad for Listerine deodorant featured a photograph of a nude woman's back and the side of her breast. Woodbury soap featured what is thought to be advertising's first full-figure b&w photograph of a nude woman (shot by Edward Steichen) in 1936.
The conflict between women's actual role in society and the ways in which advertisers portrayed that role came to the forefront during World War II. While wartime propaganda encouraged women to labor for country and family, advertisers urged female factory workers to remain glamorous and keep the home running smoothly.

Many advertisers portrayed women in their newly expanded roles. For instance, Eureka showed three women in its vacuum cleaner ads—one in a military uniform, one in pants and another in typical housewifely garb.
By late 1944, however, women were being prepared, often through strategically placed advertising, to give up their jobs when the soldiers returned home. At the end of the war, advertisers began once again to show women at home, sometimes going so far as to suggest that a working mother was not a good mother. In an advertisement by Adel Precision Products Corp., a young child asked, "Mother, when will you stay home again?"
Return to the home: The '50s

During the 1950s, most advertisers portrayed women as wives and mothers. As more women entered the workforce, however, another kind of advertising made use of them as a means for selling goods and services. Those ads showed women as clerks, telephone operators and secretaries using the latest office equipment and office furniture.

Women in the ads are generally employees not bosses, followers rather than leaders; ultimately, the ads reminded readers that a woman's job was a means for finding a man and that the primary purpose for women at work was to help men succeed.
Another approach to the portrayal of women in advertising involved scantily clad females in alluring poses; those images most often appeared in ads for products used by men.

Feminism and the '60s

One of the chief targets of the revitalized women's movement in the 1960s was the representation of women in all mass media. Advertising, although a target, also became an ally, as the industry provided a variety of venues and activities for the single, self-supporting woman.

Advertisers came under severe scrutiny from feminist groups, women's organizations and students of mass communications. As the debate over women's images in advertising intensified, the National Organization for Women, founded in 1966, sought to eliminate gender-based stereotypes in the mass media.
During the '60s, emphasis began to be placed on the independent woman who, although married, drove her own car, had a fulfilling job and participated in or made major purchasing decisions.
This era culminated in a December 1969 protest outside Macy's Department Store in New York. The protest, which may have been the first organized demonstration against the image of women in advertising, was staged against Mattel Toys in reaction to an ad the company had placed in Life to promote its Christmas toy line.

Criticism and change

In March 1970, NOW created the Barefoot & Pregnant Awards of the Week; the group distributing thousands of stickers that proclaimed: "This ad insults women."
Ad executives were re-evaluating their portrayals of women's roles in society. A classic ad from that period came from the Polaroid camera campaign featuring actors James Garner and Mariette Hartley. Ms. Hartley was shown in a distinctly non-traditional role—fixing a car.

One of the turning points in advertising's portrayal of women came with a landmark campaign from Revlon in 1973. The Charlie perfume campaign featured confident young women in tailored pantsuits pursuing traditionally male-oriented activities. Grey Advertising created the first Charlie ads.
In 1975, a new agency, Advertising to Women, was founded. Its intent was to reach the contemporary, confident, career-oriented woman who was not inhibited by her sexuality. Market research conducted by the agency showed that women were responsible for most household purchases, 60% of all vacation destination choices and nearly 30% of new car selections.

The superwoman

Advertising in the 1980s portrayed career-minded women as "supermoms," and the industry began to grapple with integrating the traditional and contemporary roles of women. One classic ad from the period was one for Enjoli perfume, which depicted a sexy but capable woman who could "bring home the bacon, fry it up in a pan and never let you forget you're a man."
Women Against Pornography, a U.S. lobbying group, was concerned about the sexual images of women portrayed in advertising and the influence of such images on sexual violence against women. The group founded an annual awards program to applaud and censure ads on the basis of presence or absence of sexist overtones.

In 1983, Jockey, a company known primarily for its line of men's underwear, introduced the "Jockey for Her" campaign (from Minneapolis-based Campbell Mithun), which featured real women representing a range of professions, ages and body types. The brand became an instant success; within five years, it was the most popular U.S. brand of women's underwear, commanding a 40% share of the market.

Emerging images

By the 1990s, dramatic changes had occurred in the depiction of women in advertising. One groundbreaking ads was for Maidenform, which pictured some of the objects representing slang terms for woman—a fox, a tomato, a doll and a chick. The text accompanying the ad read, "While images used to describe women are simple and obvious, women themselves rarely are. Just something we like to keep in mind when designing our lingerie."

Other advertisers also abandoned traditional strategies that had been used to depict women. During this decade, advertisers of traditionally male-targeted products—such as athletic shoes, cars and beer—began to focus on female consumers.

A new genre of advertisements came to the forefront, signaling a new attitude: "reverse sexism." Advertisers used the liberated woman's "I don't need a man" mindset to create new ads portraying women.

Bodyslimmer Lingerie showed a woman from the neck down wearing a one-piece undergarment with copy that read, "While you don't necessarily dress for men, it doesn't hurt, on occasion, to see one drool like the pathetic dog that he is."

A breakthrough for women of color occurred in 1992 when Tyra Banks, an African-American model, signed a contract to represent Cover Girl in its ads; she was the first non-white woman used in major cosmetics advertising.
Research that showed a definitive correlation between eating disorders and advertising gained prominence in the 1990s. Because many female models were extremely thin—often two to three sizes smaller than the average American woman—psychologists, nutritionists and activists focused on advertising as contributing to the growing numbers of girls and women suffering from bulimia or anorexia nervosa.
By the turn of the 21st century, many key positions in advertising were occupied by women, enabling them to exert a major influence on ad campaigns. Some critics of the portrayal of women in advertising hoped this situation would give rise to more positive images of women.

#advertisement

The Objectification of Women in Advertising

How Advertising Often Treats Women As a Commodity

•••
BY
Updated January 28, 2019
Since the introduction of advertising many centuries ago, women have been objectified, and in some instances, insulted or degraded. Despite the efforts of many people, it's apparent that society is still seeing the same patterns of objectification and the mindless use of sexualized women in advertising campaigns.
In many respects, the problem has escalated. With the proliferation of photo retouching software, women's bodies are not just flawless, they are anatomically impossible. This is harmful on many levels.
Advertising False Ideals
Advertising, marketing, and the fashion industry have created a new type of woman that does not exist in the real world. The "Barbie Doll" look they're selling has some recognizable features: 
  •        She has no wrinkles, blemishes, or scars.
  •       She has long, smooth, and shapely legs.
  •        Her waist is quite small.
  •       Her ample breasts and buttocks defy gravity.
  •        Her radiant hair looks like CGI. 
  •        Her eyes are dazzling and bright.
  •       Her teeth are shining white and perfectly straight.

Exploiting Learned Desires

At an early age, men are programmed to desire the Barbie Doll woman. This is the woman featured in ads for perfumes and lingerie. She is the centerfold in "Playboy." Women, from the same early age, are told they must look like this woman. They should aim to have long legs, perfect skin, beautiful hair, and an impossible body. 
The problem is: That woman does not exist. She is the product of hours in the makeup chair and days of photo retouching, even if she's a supermodel. Every woman has imperfections because every woman is human. 
A primary goal of advertising is to create a need so that a company can provide a product or service to meet that need. For example, men may drink certain brands of beer because they associate them with advertising's objectified women.
On the other hand, women might buy certain clothes, foods, and makeup products in an attempt to resemble the beer-drinking girl on TV.

Real-World Results

Men are taught (programmed) to view women as objects. It may have led in part to the way men view women as objects at work.
The extent of this became a public focus in late 2017 with the birth of the #MeToo and Time's Up movements, which sought to expose the culture of sexual harassment and abuse in Hollywood, and by extension, in the culture.

Early Feminists' Take

When "Our Bodies, Ourselves" was published in 1970, it urged women to love and honor their bodies. Betty Friedan, who passed away in 2006, and Gloria Steinem—alive and active at 84 as of January 2019—were founders of the feminist movement.
Both had envisioned and worked toward an egalitarian and enlightened world by the 21st century. That has not happened yet. However, if today's feminist leaders are successful in achieving their goals, advertising will not objectify women moving forward.

Changes in Advertising

Several brands, including Dove and Aerie, have moved away from the images of perfection of the past. They claim to be "Photoshop-free" and celebrate real, diverse women.
Beer brands are moving away from semi-naked models. The craft beer movement is on the rise, and they don't need Playboy bunnies to help them sell inventory—although, sadly, the majority of men will still be attracted to cliched sexy images.
If you work at an agency, you can try to steer clients away from Photoshopped images of Barbie Doll women. Veer away from the skinny size 2 models, and champion the use of normal-sized women as models for the products you sell. 
Disclaimer: Links have been added to various sources to help students study during Covid-19 crisis. This is in public service. 



-->